We get things wrong. When we do, we fix them.

What triggers an update?

A rule changes. A source changes. A product changes. Better evidence appears. Or a reader spots something we missed. Any of those can be a reason to go back in.

Big mistakes

For a material factual error, we re-check the source, fix the affected passage and look around it for knock-on problems. Significant corrections should be visible when that context matters.

Small edits

Typos, formatting and clarity fixes do not need a ceremony when they do not change the substance.

“Last reviewed” is not a force field

A last-reviewed date tells you when we checked the material. It does not promise that the world stopped changing afterwards. Fast-moving topics still deserve a look at the linked source.

Think we missed something?

Point to the article, the sentence and — if you have one — the source that contradicts it. That gives us something concrete to check rather than turning corrections into a shouting match.