Facts need receipts

If a claim matters — regulation, safety, a technical standard, a product capability — it should be possible to trace where it came from. Primary or authoritative sources come first when they exist.

Fact is not opinion

We like arguments. That only works if readers can tell what is established, what is interpretation and what is still uncertain. Jurisdiction, date, model and version matter when they change the answer.

No invented evidence

No fake tests, surveys, sample sizes, interviews, customer experiences, expert identities or partnerships. If we have not flown it, handled it or tested it, we do not call the piece hands-on.

Disagreement is part of the product

Different views are welcome, including views that challenge ProDrone. Debate works best when people attack the idea, not the person. Spam, impersonation, abuse and obviously bad-faith disruption are not the same thing as disagreement.

Commercial reality stays visible

ProDrone Insights is published by ProDrone. Useful links are fine. Forced links are not. Material commercial relationships should be clear enough that readers do not have to guess.

AI is a tool, not an alibi

AI may help organise research, draft, edit, format or check work. It is not treated as the source of truth. Important factual claims still need evidence.

If we are wrong, fix it

Material factual errors should be re-checked, corrected and, where useful, made visible rather than quietly disappearing.